Future is awesome?
There’s such a future-push within the web-world, it’s a tad crazy (and ppl know it). The fact that I’m writing this short note is more about my interest in preservation that publication. I’d like to look back one day and say “Ha! I was sooo wrong (or right!).”
So without further ado, here’s my “Future of the Web Browser.” (as opposed to his)
First off, the internet has always been more than just the web. There’s numerous protocols which fly all around, and tonnes of data packets which go to places other than IE, Firefox or Safari (or Opera, Epiphany, Midori, etc). This is the first point: the web has turned into a 3-level programming arena with AJAX: JSON packets of data + css stlying onto an html frame. It’s the browser which glues ‘em together. But do we need a browser for all of this? Greasemonkey scripts have successfully edited the CSS & the browser needs some kind of framework, but the data.. ah yes, it’s always about the information. Ever put an RSS feed into your browser’s bookmarks-bar? Yup. That’s the future. But why should this be JUST in the browser? Why not in other applications? Or in the deskbar-panel (if such exists in the future).Excel has (for years) supported database connections, and in recent years, supported them over the web with XML. Keep. going. Is a spreadsheet the only thing that needs raw data?
So that’s my first-round of ideas: open data, in open formats, available in dispersed locations. Such diffusion of the web into separate, external apps or media seems inevitble. People can handle 5 different things on one table-top, but why cook where you disassemble your car? Maybe I’m human, and LIKE to get up from my seat, see the world from other angles.
Second, now that we have removed raw-data from the web browser (and put it to good use), we are left with the other genre’s of content: news & blogs (oh wait, that’s already in your RSS reader). Friends status updates (again, why can’t this be integrated somewhere useful, where you want it to be). Youtube and videos can also be extracted (if corporations get their grubby hands out & let content be open & free!) What’s left for a browser? Not much. Nothing unless there is novel content which is not diffused into another application.
Notice all my ideas still revolve around a “desktop” (which I actually despise). All I’m saying is that so long as the native-coded, windowed environment exists, the web can be in places other than the browser. iTunes is the prime example. Second, yes, there is a chance of “every window is a browser.” That’s already the case/possible with Prism, making your OS useful only as a windowing manager (which I debate doesn’t manage very well).
Anyways that’s the future as I can see.. Either content is re-embedded into HTML, for proprietary purposes, or it is free. Either way, it is in native code somehow.
The only other point is caching, which HTML5 brings. I love caching, I’m writing an “everything-checker-viewer” right now which survives on caching alone. Live-data is nice, but until connections across the world become faster, consistent and needless-to-mention available/accessible, caching will inevitably rule.


