Archive for the ‘life-of-a-geek’ Category

Smart(er)phones mean affective consumer trends

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Remember your first cell-phone? It was likely not the *original* cellphone,

In my case, it was a kyocera green-screen on my parents verizon network. It DID have mobile-web (remember those WHTML/WAP-sites?) when I went to Chicago. My next was a color-screened nokia until both myself and the web got serious and my sony-erickson was the fastest GPRS connected phone (which I infrared-connected to my HP WinMo device quite requently!)

Enough about my history, on to my point: I’m a geek, so I loved the capabilities of the phone, no matter how tedious it was. Most consumers aren’t willing to go through the tedium for the glory, and *finally* we have a crop of large-screened phones which allow something aside from left-down-right-up-left-left-down-ok magic of the early Nintendo days!

WinMo tried to be this player years back. Wow! An interface that was colorful, full and wasn’t ridiculously hidden behind 19 menus. It had a Today screen which told me more than the TIME! But Windows/M$ got lazy, were happy to ignore emerging tech while raking in the cash, and Apple took over, overnight.

Now, in the wake of the iPhone, LG & Samsung have created their own semi-smart interaces. I’ve been running the Samsung TouchWiz for awhile now, and I like it. I’ve played with LG’s, and it seems quite on-par.

But just look at this:

LG's newest

Facebook. There. Touch it!

Compared to 4 yrs ago:

Right-Down, Right, ok, Right?

Compared to 10 yrs ago:

Old Kyocera

There's an interface? Where?

This last sort of phone has no affective association (consumer gratitude for being simple, easy, beautiful) as much as the newer phones. Perhaps this is evidence of over-indulgence of luxury, but if I’m going to use this device, then I want it easier. I’m going to switch each time to another brand, trying to find a better edition. But worse off, the companies back then never stopped changing their interfaces, making it more and more confusing to consumers looking to latch-on. I’d be willing to bet Nokia owns the world-market simply on the history of a consistent Symbian interface.

When a URL is not url (death to flash)

Friday, February 12th, 2010

Media center/libraries are a joke. They require files to view, yet the present state of the web is pushing towards renting a stream. Across the landscape, your media distribution channels are too varied to allow for any progress on the part of the people/users.  File-ownership is where it started.. but ownership somehow didn’t equal distrution rights. When “rights” aren’t in line with behavior, it’s legally called “infringment”. When you flip it upside down, and the law is too heavy-handed for behavior, it’s call totalitarianism.  While I won’t get sucked into that never-ending debate, how can a user ever access all his media outlets in a sane manner?

Let’s skip ahead for a minute to the future. When I see something on a blog or otherwise, and I wish to *share* it with someone, I’d like to be able to do that. No one doubts this is a crime. If the person is in the living room with me, I’d like to be able to swipe,circle,copy-paste,drag-n-drop,etc. the item of interest onto my TV or projector, instead of handing over my laptop. After all, that’s what a larger-than-13″-screen is for. How can this be accomplished today when the object of interest is a file? (be it a pdf, image, song or video) This is the easiest: you copy the file to the server, and have the server config’d to display what is newest in a folder.

But what are we to do when the object of interest is a stream, and the stream is not “open”, but bound-in by flash? Examples: youtube, hulu, last.fm, pandora. These things I cannot drag-and-drop. They may have a URL, but the data is not separate from the view: navigating with a mouse through a website/flash start-stop-pause control is still required. I can’t exactly do that with a remote, unless I go hi-tech with a wii-mote; even then navigating the web is clunky.

All I’m asking for is a pure data-feed-URL. One which is Universal.. for all things trying to Locate a Resource, y’know? Until then, it’s either a boycott of Flash, or giving up on the dream of simple resource-sharing. Flash killed the internet. But who’s going to boycott hulu, except Apple & Comcast (who’s trying to buy Hulu’s #1 content provider, NBC!). Wow– now there’s a mess for ya.

Computers, netbooks & smartphone products table

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

For all those who were or are now confused about the computer/netbook/smartphone market, here’s a bit to help clear one the techy bits:

Product Hardware Software
Open Microsoft Apple
Computer Intel (x86) Linux (Desktop) Windows OSX
Netbook Intel (x86) Linux (Desktop) Windows hack-only
Netbook (Gen2010) (ARM) Linux (Variants) WinMo
iPad Apple A4 (ARM) iPhone
Phone (ARM) Linux (Variants) WinMo iPhone

Notice that there’s another column I forgot: Android. They’re a variant of Linux, and running on both desktop & netbooks (sort of). Oddly enough, Android on netbooks took all the fire/criticism up front about being too limited. Apple then stepping into the void and filled it with something just. usable. enough.

The only commentary on Apple’s latest device is two-fold: (1) No multitasking? I’m a fan of what I’ve called ‘limited computing‘, but this is a tad too constricting. (2) Likewise constricting is the iPhone AppStore: only those approved by Apple will do.

For the price, I’d rather have AlwaysInnovating’s Tablet/Netbook. It’s effectively the same thing, just with the software I already use. Trouble-spot: all linux software is old-school & menu-driven. Neither linux application communities (KDE nor Gnome) seem to be concerned with this forward motion UI’s.

Design, materiality and trustworthiness

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Designers like to make prototypes: something the “people” can never use. A recent Gizmodo article explains this well. But I will continue on a sub-set of this idea.

From Consumers willing to throw their money to the next best-thing, or the more rational, planned among us, we all do not care what a company “can” do. What they “could” do is like a carrot hanging in front of us. We all want the product or relationship which does-as-promised:one which is trustworthy.

Within today’s tech market I see 2 significant, praactical problems behind trustworthiness (aside from “theorhetical” or philosophic distrust in Capitalism or Modernism..)

Trouble #1:  What we treat as mere Commodity, is actually an incredibly powerful (all too powerful!) system for the promise to be fulfilled. Systems fail, especially when insufficient sub-ground (peat!) level knowledge and information is not accounted for. The correlate: What most people “take for granted” (read: take as solid ground, trustworthy) is only trustworthy under certain conditions, not under ALL conditions. The lack of info, concern & detail at this level is why things break for some people and not for others.

Trouble #2: Design/designers face/have created this problem. Designers, working in immaterial wonder-lands have all free-reign to imagine, imagine, imagine. We all wish time and space for this freedom for ourselves. As children, perhaps some of us had such time. Designers need feedback, and they need to take parameters early & seriously. If they cannot work within boundaries, they are not responsible designers, but children. If they cannot see the that they cannot see, harsh reality will exact their fate. But if no feedback is ever given to them, if they are protected from the “production” (materiality) phase, how can they learn?

Courier’s Potential Issues

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

The bits missing from the Courier Video-demos:
First off, it is very, very limited:

  • Left:
    • Calendar
    • Contacts
    • Web
    • Photos
  • Right:
    • Maps (associated with contacts)
    • Journal (dual-pane)
    • web also (wait, which side do I view webpages on.. both?)
  • Middle:
    • Clipboard-Pocket

This is it? Doesn’t sound like much. So what do I use my laptop for these days?

  • Libraries of media, for which iTunes & Amazon are trying to be the end-all. For this, I likely will run a streaming media source, or keep my library on a home server, so the laptop neWed not have a multi-terabyte drive.
  • Basic file editing/viewing, for which Google Documents is trying to be the end-all. And so long as your online (or whenever local caching of GDocs hits) this might work. But Google doesn’t support various Journal formats at present.

Web viewing

There doesn’t seem to be any web-organization, just a list of tabs/Safari-like window-images. My use of the web falls into the 2 categories previously mentioned: the daily views of interest & responsibility (like reading the news & checking the bank) and researching the latest idea & interest I had, or for classes.

File-Viewing

I wanna make sure this has full office & PDF file editing & annotation, otherwise, it’s not a laptop replacement. Clearly this thing won’t be creating the office-heavy/design-heavy files.. but it should have full-view of them.

Filetypes supported are likely OneNote->PDF instead of the millions of incongruent filetypes presently on any one system. Others’ ability to edit & comment on PDFs at present is limited. This is an early-collaboration tool, not a late-collaboration, final-product kind of tool.

Pocket

There is a heavy amount of visual drag-and-dropping, specifically of web/PNG images. But I deal with excel and photoshop files too. Will previews be auto-generated for these as well? How will I know which spreadsheet is which when I place it in the pocket? Sometimes filenames *are* handy.

Minor

We didn’t see any online chat-abilities with the contacts, something my nokia N800 did well.

The 2 biggest hurdles for development:

  1. Metadata heavy
  2. Handwriting heavy

Desktop Computing hasn’t replaced the desktop (and shouldn’t)

Monday, October 5th, 2009

Most of our desks are filled with frequently used items. Some bits might be more long-term, be it clutter, research or sentimental items.

However, “Computer as a Desktop” or “Desktop on the Computer” is a failed ideal of the early, by-gone days of computing. Simply: everything is not and cannot be on your personal computer *screen* let alone actually on the computer.

I’m a huge computing fan, I even PDF my readings for class (thanks to an old printer/scanner my wife’s new fancy-pants mac can’t use!). I annotate the PDFs & highlight them accordingly. I’m very document heavy, being a BachArts instead of a BachScience guy.

Compared to the image above, I’ve got only 3 piles of junk on my upper right & left corners: 2 book piles on the right & 1 ‘organizer’ on the left which holds everything from my keys & cellphone to pens, coupons & my external harddrive. And sticky-notes. Stickies can be moved, computer notes cannot so easily (yet). Cell phones & keys are much more ‘real’ objects, requiring separate spatial existence — like the kleenex box nearby. No computer will replace kleenex (I hope!).

So with all this, I’m not convinced the “desktop” metaphor is worthwhile, or even warranted. Sure there’s lots of files in folders on my computer, but (a) search has replaced some of that and (b) files and folders are in cabinets, not desks..

So, iTunes and other newer applications take on the library metaphor. You search a library; it is referenced, accessed and used. But that is just for an app, not a unifying theme between apps (though a good argument could and should be made why this shouldn’t be so!). User folders on Mac & Linux are now folder-lists of Documents, Media-types (pictures, music, videos).. Various netbook UI’s have ran with this as well. But none hold together any more than the files-in-folders theme. iTunes has it’s own folder inside your music folder. I know why this is, but shouldn’t there be a platform-independent format for these datasources?

And the desktop folder itself? Is there ever any real purpose to it? Most mobile platforms don’t have one and most linux geeks don’t place their files on the ‘desktop’. Microsoft Courier lacks a desktop as well, instead merging the desktop and the clipboard into one middle-bar for all things temporary (which most ppl use their desktop for).

Really looking at a normal, original desktop, it’s more a matter of objects which are acted upon with tools. Applications are the tool-set these days, but they fail to interact and avail themselves *on the desktop*. Desktops are loaded up with file *icons* not the file itself. Mac tries to maintain this file-window independence, but it’s just a jumble of windows overtop background pictures and icons. I cannot go from an open spreadsheet window and start making it pretty with a document design editor. These apps are mutually exclusive, and ruining any desktop metaphor.

All this critique is pointing towards a unified file format which all applications agree upon, and all have access to modify at anytime.

Clearly this is an idealism which won’t occur without limits placed. And such limits break the very nature of ‘general computing’ over which the Mac/Windows debate rages.

I’m a huge fan of limited and thereby differentiated computing: the workstation should not be running the same UI as a eJournal (Courier!). And neither of them are sufficient for the task of media center.

We once had a division of these 3 tiers with servers, desktops & mobile devices. Then WindowsNT was thrown on servers & XP(and NT variant!) was thrown on faux-tablets UMPC’s. This UI/codebase permeation is inverse of the ideal, where the low-level is the universal, and the high-level is specialized to the task.

Moblin 2.0 has a chance with this for at least one front.

One step closer to useful

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

UI usability is consistently my no. 1 time-suck. I’ve ‘wasted’ countless hours config’ing and reconfig’ing GNOME panels into assumed-need sorts. I’ve given up and returned to Mac & heeded again the siren call to Linux’ potential simplicity.

My latest spin *was* playing with screen-maximizing UI’s: task-bar-less environments, panel-over-top window-titlebars, then I turned wanna-be tablet with the iPen.

But I’ll not deny, the best ‘inspiration’ has been the non-existent-yet(?) Microsoft Courier. Here’s a list of the bits, related & not, which I’ve come up with:

Dual-pane

My 13″ macbook is nearly-exactly 2×9″ screens. Yes, this is very Courier-esque. Especially if I use Linux’ dragbox in between panes! But the benefit here is window management. In Xwindows-land, there’s lots of these things called ‘window managers’. They’re supposed to, y’know.. manage windows. What do they ACTUALLY do? Place windows in wierd locations & sizes which require you to use a taskbar, alt-tab or expose’ your day away. I’m not down with that. Time for a ’tiling” window manager. Yet I’m just looking for 2 panels, and on a 13″ screen, that’s plenty. If I config my window-placer-thing to throw some of my apps on the left, I (craziest idea ever) can expect them to be there. I know where they are! Which leads me to my next point..

Priority

Since I’m not fussin’ with my 9 windows that are open, wondering where to look for ‘em (something a taskbar is supposed to do, but doesn’t supply the requisite window-parallel usage scenario).. anyways, since I’m not wasting time placing windows, I can focus on what I’m supposed to be doing: being a human with responsibilities over resources and being creative and learning. Those are the categories my applications have taken: email, calendar & files on the left, OpenOffice, Journal & Web on the right.

Lists, lists, lists!

Perhaps this is more iphone-y than anything, but there’s some goodness to be had with the removal of clutter (and there’s plenty on the web!) Yet, I use google calendar & email all day long. I don’t need another cal or mail app, I just need a browser open with these bits in it. But even these apps aren’t clean. Facebook, Yahoo Mail, Google Mail, Google Reader AND Google Calendar ALL have sidebars. Why, oh why do we need sidebars? They take up sooo much screen real-estate, especially after you scroll.

Bad:

What you get when viewing web-apps half-screen'd or in portrait

What you get when viewing web-apps half-screen'd or in portrait

Good:

Ahh, mobile: a clutter-free web-experience!

Ahh, mobile: a clutter-free web-experience!

You just have to load the mobile versions of the webapps you use. To find them, I viewed them on my phone & checked the url. I’ve also found the ‘print’ versions of yahoo news to be similarly readable.

Conditions: sure forcing all my windows into 2 locations (left/right) & 2 states (half-screen or maximized) is ‘limiting’, but I’m a limited human! I need some parallels here to stay sane. I can’t be moving & resizing windows all day long.

Perhaps I’m just getting old, and will eventually regress into the old lady who only has one window open (maximized) at a time. Until then, this is a good compromise.

Courier, please deliver soon, or I’ll make you out of Linux!

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

Everyone’s all abuzz with Microsoft’s latest leaked prototype: Courier. On an off-note, it’s hilarious to contrast the handwritten everything with the king of monospace fonts! (and previously, my latest interest has been the long-awaited crunchpad.)

But there’s 2 things I’m here to mention: my dream & the obvious rising behind Courier.

Why Courier is Obvious:

First off, how many people do you see carrying around a notebook/folio of some variety? Everyone. The business guys do it for their contacts, dates & files. College kids do it for their class notes. Artsy-kids do it for their scribble-pics. Christians have a habit of doing it for their Bible study/sermon notes. Everyone.

Second: netbook+eReader. Limited computing strikes again, and awaiting for a convergence.

Third: Intel’s atom platform (and I would argue ARM even more!) is ready for this kind of thin-and-goodness. Especially with ssd’s (heck, I’d be happy with an SDHC!)

My Little Dream:

I’m a fan of the UI-customizability of Linux. Always have been: it’s what keeps me away from MacOS. Right now, I’ve got a toolbar that has everything I need in it: time, calendar-on-click, applets & a task-switcher. All this overlays the wasted-space of window-titlebar. Most of the time I maximize my apps, so I can focus. But there are somethings that should be a sidebar: notably a tabbed filemanager (since I already have a tabbed term thanks to tilda).

lxpanel-coloredAnd there’s no reason why a quick photo-viewer, calculator, contacts & datebook cannot also be in this sidebar (especially if cache’d & synced from Google!) All this sidebar stuff is too perfect. Why not make a Window Manager that runs specific apps in specific ‘frames’ (yes, like HTML old-skool style). The frames are resizable & collapsable. Ths is so (similar but) much more useful than a tiling WM.

Next up, I’ve never, ever understood file dialog boxes. I do however understand Delicious’ tagging. It auto-generates recommendations, and why not do this for files?  Linux is built for this: symlinks.

And while we’re at it, why not kill off scrollbars & make everything grab-and-draggable. Just use a modifier key (or both-click). Then we can have the app be like a magnifying glass, with the edges smushed to show you how much more you have down there (in preview-style).

As for all this journally stuff, Xournal is the single-best program I have ever, ever, ever encountered. Multiple-layers? yup. Print to PDF? Yup. Wanna add a new page? Click the ‘next page’ button. It could remove all it’s menus if it just had a ‘preferences’ dialog box. It is the model for any journaling program.

Lastly, mouse-gestures are very hot lately. I don’t use them because I’d like ‘em to be like Courier: context-specific AND list suggested actions, instead of always acting on its own.

Dreams, dreams, dreams.

All I’m sayin’ is if ASUS puts out an Intel Atom dual-screen netbook/eReader next year, or even this year, I’m putting my dreams to work. Just need to solve 2 problems:  the sidebar thinger (update: “devilspie” might be halfway there for me) & handwriting recognition (and I’ve got a prototype system coming this december when classes are out!).

The iPen Review

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

The iPen, by Finger System, Inc.

First off, sometimes you can judge a book by it’s cover– especially when a marketing department has ahold of the cover. By this I mean the “Ages 5 & up” label. Yes, this IS a kids play toy, and I’m going to try and take it seriously. I hope that doesn’t make me a kid. Likely does.

First Impressions

first 15mins:  holy crap this is fussy! How does this work right at all?

second 15mins:  let’s try to figure some workarounds..

third 15mins:  ok, now with a basic system in place, perhaps there’s a chance.. a very small chance..

last 15mins:  It brings back the good ol’ days of owning a pocket pc.

1 month in: with the right linux-config’d system in place, the iPen has it’s place, and can even replace the need to own a full $1700 tabletPC. For $15, it’s a steal. But the whole repetitive stress thing isn’t any better or worse, but that’s my fault for being tied to this thing for 12hrs /day!

“The System” (My Linux config)

0) You really should use the old-school optical 1mm grid they provide.. graph paper doesn’t cut it. I ended up cutting a 2″x3″ square out & taping it on the corner of my laptop (nearly over the trackpad!) when I’m not at my desk. However, when running in ’super slow mode’, i need the whole thing. Choose cutting wisely.
1) hold the mouse a bit more upright than a regular pen, especially when not using the grid-pad :(
2) Slow the mouse settings all the way down: xset m 0 0, (or see my ultra-slowed-down xorg.conf)
3) Use xournal to scribble notes & PDF annotate, zoomed in to full-width (150%), unless running ultra-slow, then tis fine zoomed out where the notebook lines are like college-ruled. (yes, i measured). Xournal also supports graph paper, colored paper & custom-paper sizes. Handy for when I rotate the screen. Also, I found having the default right-click to be the ‘hand’ is very handy (like acrobat’s hand/grab-drag-scrolling)
4) Use cellwriter for single character input (aka PocketPC-land!). Takes some config, but it gets pretty good.
5) Firefox plugin: “Grab and drag”!  This is when it hit me: “Don’t try and use a pen like a mouse. Use a pen like a pen!”

The Speed Test

With cell writer config’d & trained (not a hard process at all),
and using the sentence: “The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog”:
Typing: “THe quick brown fox jumped over hte lazy dog” is 8-9 seconds, with only 2 errors.
Cellwriter: “the quick brown fox jumped overthe lazy dog.” in 58 seconds, first try, then 44s!, with 2 errors as well.
Handwriting on paper: 13seconds
Xournal: 24seconds.

A 5-6 times increase in time is wretched. Especially if I in-line corrected about 4-6 characters thanks to a shaky nervous hand! No doubt I’ve cellwritten faster since this early test, but I seriously doubt it will ever come close to touch typing. The other variable is that when typing, I type faster than I think, so I’m always stopping to think about what I’m saying. But with cellwriter, I’m writing so slow, I can think about what I’m saying. Trouble is, if it’s too slow, I’m thinking about writing the characters & forgetting about what I’m saying.

Improvements

It’s amazing just how sensitive the nature of handwriting is. There’s 2 very strong components to pencil writing that is lacking with this digital pen.
1) Pencils are pressure sensitive across a gradient, not a binary on/off. You can swipe a pencil and get a line. When you lift a pencil while handwriting, it’s more a light drag across the paper than it is a full 1mm lift. Hopefully I’m explaining this right: the ipen requires a 1mm lifting or dropping of the pen to register a swipe. This is not natural, however oddly enough, when the mouse is super-slow, this problem dissipates, as well as with getting used to it.

2) Tracking. When we lift a pen and move it, it now resides to write in the new location. On the slowest mouse motion, the ‘mousing area’ is still 2″ wide x 1.5″ high. This is hardly a one-to-one (like true tabletPC’s have) with a 13.3″ diagonal screen! Second, this pen is very sensitive and you have to lift the pen a good centimeter off the surface to stop it from moving the mouse cursor (to get the mouse cursor where you want it, relative to the hand-on-paper position). This is also shown when setting down & picking up the pen.. a mouse or trackpad will leave the cursor & mouse, the pen must be set & picked up again.
One last comment, I’d prefer to have a scrollwheel where the right click button is. But some of that is solved by FF’s grab-and-drag plugin. If only that plugin was across all X/GNOME/KDE applications!

Multiple mouse config in Ubuntu

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Since I’ve bought an ipen, I need different settings for the pen and trackpad. The trackpad should have all the fun little bits that it came with, 2-finger scrolling & a decent speed, while the ipen, to be useful for writing notes in PDFs needs to be soo much slower (a 3/4 ratio of pen-to-screen).  This setup will of course apply to any multiple input device setup..

  1. backup xorg.conf (in terminal: sudo cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf-original)
  2. with the mouse plugged in, lets find which device is which:
    1. sudo cat /dev/input/pxaux   ..now touch the trackpad: see funny letters for each motion? Good. (control-c to exit)
    2. sudo gedit /etc/X11/xorg.conf, add these lines:
      Section "InputDevice"
      Identifier "Synaptics Touchpad"
      Driver "synaptics"
      Option "SendCoreEvents" "true"
      Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
      Option "Protocol" "auto"
      Option "HorizScrollDelta" "0"
      Option "SHMConfig" "on"
      EndSection
  3. Now, config the mouse by the same method, but trying /dev/input/mouse0 .. through mouse4.
  4. Add these lines accordingly:
    Section "InputDevice"
           Identifier "Configured Mouse"
            Driver      "mouse"
            Option      "Protocol" "auto"
            Option      "Device" "/dev/input/mouse4"
            Option      "Emulate3Buttons" "no"
           #Option      "Resolution" "50"
           #Option      "Sensitivity"       "0.24"
           #Option      "ConstantDeceleration" "4"
    EndSection
  5. You’ll notice the last 3 lines are commented out.. I used the ‘constant deceleration’ to slow down my 800dpi mouse-pen. I enver played with the other 2, though they might work as well.
  6. Further, I had to add these lines as well for everything to work:
    Section "ServerFlags"
    Option "AutoAddDevices" "0"
    Option "DontZap" "off" #ctl-alt-back restart-X
    EndSection
    
    Section "ServerLayout"
            Identifier "Default Layout"
            Screen "Default Screen"
            InputDevice "Synaptics Touchpad"
    EndSection

When all is said & done, I also found gsynaptics (sudo apt-get install gsynaptics) which allowed fun things like ‘ipod-scrolling’ and corner/edge events.

Final note: I needed my pen to be slower than even xset m 0 0 could give me, though that was close.

2009-10-22 UPDATE: Instead of EVERYTHING above, I finally got this to work in HAL (which means keep the original /etc/X11/xorg.conf file clean), thanks to removing mouseemu which was always making the usb pen-mouse be reconfig’d to normal acceleration! In ubuntu 9.04, I simply created this file: /etc/hal/fdi/policy/10-x11-input.fdi:

<?xml version=”1.0″ encoding=”ISO-8859-1″?>
<deviceinfo version=”0.2″>
<device>
<match key=”info.capabilities” contains=”input.mouse”>
<match key=”info.product” string=”Finger System Inc. i-Pen Mouse FM-100BN”>
<merge key=”input.x11_options.ConstantDeceleration” type=”string”>3</merge>
</match>
</match>
</device>
</deviceinfo>
While debugging, I confirmed the settings were in lshal & /var/log/Xorg.0.log.